By Mbungu Harrison Email, info.newsbooth@gmail.com


One Petroleum, a prominent Mombasa-based petroleum company, has come forward to strongly refute allegations of impropriety in a recent emergency fuel supply contract. The company asserts that the deal was initiated by the government and fully sanctioned through the Ministry of Energy. In a detailed statement released on Friday, April 24, 2026, One Petroleum dismissed the accusations as baseless and claimed that the company and its directors are being unfairly targeted.


The controversy arises amid media scrutiny over the procurement process and the quality of fuel delivered under the emergency contract. Reports have questioned the transparency and legitimacy of the deal, prompting One Petroleum to clarify its position. The company insists that it did not actively seek the contract but responded to an official request from the government. "We did not seek this contract. We responded to a written government request. Every aspect – quantity, price, and even quality – was communicated to and approved by the Ministry of Energy in writing, with formal waivers in place," the statement read.


One Petroleum emphasized its commitment to transparency, stating that it has engaged with relevant authorities at every stage of the process. The firm maintains that it has cooperated fully with government authorities and investigators to ensure compliance with all regulatory requirements. The company expressed its concern over the ongoing reports that it claims have misrepresented its role in the transaction. "One Petroleum and its Directors are being targeted without any legitimate basis. We will take every step necessary – including legal action – to protect our reputation and that of our Directors," the statement warned.


The statement comes at a time when there is heightened public scrutiny over emergency fuel imports and procurement procedures in Kenya. The country has faced challenges with fuel supply in recent months, leading to increased demand for emergency imports. One Petroleum insists that all aspects of the consignment met regulatory requirements and were cleared by government ministries before delivery. The company is prepared to defend its reputation vigorously, highlighting its adherence to legal and procedural standards throughout the contract's execution.


As the situation unfolds, One Petroleum's stance underscores the complexities involved in emergency procurement processes and the need for clear communication between private companies and government entities to avoid misunderstandings and ensure accountability.